I spend a lot of time driving to and from work. Each week, it can be up to 4-5 hours. And when I drive, I think a lot about all
sorts of stuff, especially my writing and stories. The novel I’m working on right now has felt a
bit lackluster. As I started to sort
through my story and what’s missing, I realized that I like one specific
plotline. That’s the hero’s
journey.
When I was much younger, I remember going to my cousins’
house over the summer. They had a lot of
awesome computer games that encouraged creativity. There was one specific game that allowed you
to create your own stories, put different characters in different scenes, allow
them to interact with one another and change settings. They would create amazing scenarios and stories. When they gave me the chance to try, my story
consisted of 8-9 characters walking from place to place until they get to their
final destination. I even remember one
of my cousins telling me that “nothing’s happening.”
Most of my stories consist of my characters traveling from
one place to another on a ‘hero’s journey.’
Most of the novel will actually consist of the journey, and this novel
is no exception. So as I’m sorting
through the plot, I realized that it’s just like that story I created when I
was younger. Nothing was happening. They were just traveling.
But that’s not what the hero’s journey is. If a character has to move from point A to point
B, then it can’t be the story of a drive down I-80 in Wyoming. (Which if any of you have driven down I-80,
then you know what I mean.) Think of The
Hobbit or the Lord of the Rings. Those
characters did nothing but travel, but they ran into Orcs, Dragons, Dwarves,
even Gollum. The entire story isn’t
about where they’re going, but how they get there and what they face as they
travel.
And that’s what my story was missing. My characters needed more conflict, even if
they’re just traveling. So I started
with a ball of fire. And an
earthquake. Suddenly, my story wasn’t
stalled, and my characters weren’t just traveling, they were living a story. And that’s what the reader wants. They want to see the characters struggle, to
empathize with them.
So if your story feels lackluster, maybe you should take the
scenic route instead of driving straight down the highway.
Honestly stories don't always need action. I'm not really one to talk though, mine tend to start with explosions. But what is important is that the story has a plot, a goal. If I asked you what your story was about how would you answer? Frequently, people will say: "It's a story about five 20 somethings travelling across america" and I would respond: "Doing what?"
ReplyDeleteThe earthquake and explosions are nice, but characters need goals. You're half right that stories need conflict to keep the reader going, but if there's no sun on the horizon they can't make it to the goal. Sure one could say: They're trying to get to a certain state, but why? Is a close friend dying there? Are they working on borrowed time themselves? You make the characters believable and likable so the reader buys into their plight.
An interesting story comes from the culmination of interesting characters, stunning settings, substantial actions, and high stakes. After all you don't want to go from "Your characters aren't doing anything" to "Your characters are doing a bunch of pointless things."